• Comment

The Magnolia Trace post-mortem

A footnote

Posted: January 25, 2012 - 12:05am  |  Updated: January 25, 2012 - 4:22am

Columbia County Commission Chairman Ron Cross this past week declared, almost as an afterthought, that the county’s attempt to undo the Magnolia Trace development is finished.

“As far as our action, this is the end of it,” Cross said, reporting to fellow commissioners on the opinion from an outside attorney that the “affordable housing” project can’t be, and likely never could have been, stopped by local government action.

While riled-up residents of the area surrounding the Martinez development might not be satisfied, no one should be surprised. When commissioners agreed to hire a Savannah attorney to review the project and see if there were any possible roadblocks that could be thrown in its path, pretty much everyone already knew what the outcome would be. The whole thing was just a face-saving attempt from commissioners facing down an angry mob.

Yet in addition to allowing heads to cool, the passage of time also provides an opportunity for a less-passionate review of what Magnolia Trace is – and isn’t.

The negatives are pretty obvious. Magnolia Trace will be a large-scale warehouse for government assisted renters. Conversely, because it will be the newest thing in an old area, Magnolia Trace could undercut rental prices for surrounding homes (and there are numerous rental homes in the area) while pushing neighboring property values, and taxes, upward.

The positives might be harder to see, or for many, to admit. The construction will be high quality. And because the developer will provide exterior maintenance, including landscaping, the project will look good – better, in fact, than many of the tired homes nearby.

In the end, it will be a glorified apartment complex, only with individual homes.

It will be educational to return to the topic in, say, five years, after enough time to evaluate all the dire doom-and-gloom predictions. We’ll likely see that just as this project isn’t going to be the greatest thing since sliced bread, as suggested by its developers, it also won’t be the death-knell for Martinez.

A footnote

County attorney Doug Batchelor denies any conflict of interest in serving as the attorney in closing the land deal for Magnolia Trace. And technically he is correct; there’s no legal or ethical prohibition to Batchelor providing services to anyone. He still has to make a living.

But when Batchelor called Chairman Cross and District 2 Commissioner Trey Allen to his office in June 2010 to hear a pitch on Magnolia Trace, he says he can’t recall whether he told them he actually was working for the developer in that meeting, rather than the county. Allen, for one, says he was under the mistaken impression that Batchelor was acting as county attorney.

That is flat-out wrong, no matter how you look at it.

There occasionally has been talk of the county hiring a staff attorney rather than paying a retainer to outside counsel. It might be time to revive that discussion, if for no other reason but to ensure that county officials know that when they’re talking to their attorney, he’s really their attorney – and not at the moment on someone else’s payroll.

  • Comment

Comments (6)

Little Lamb

Staff Attorney

Having staff attorneys has not and is not working well for Augusta.

For anything complicated or controversial, the staff attorney hires an outside attorney anyway, so we're paying double.

Little Lamb

Rising property assessments

CCNT wrote:

Magnolia Trace could undercut rental prices for surrounding homes (and there are numerous rental homes in the area) while pushing neighboring property values, and taxes, upward.

I mentioned this very notion several weeks ago when nearby residents were whining about the development bringing down surrounding property values. I never considered the flip side of bringing down surrounding rental rates.


As I Said Often

The whole problem was Batchelor not informing EVERYONE he was being paid by AEP.

It's breathtaking a footnote was added to something I brought up in the comments.

Little Lamb

Law School

Actually, I think Batchelor acted as he was taught in law school. Lawyers know that a person does not have to volunteer information. Regarding who was paying him on that fateful day in June in 2010, I'm sure Batchelor would have spoken truthfully if Cross or Allen had asked. But he was under no legal obligation to blab about who was buttering his bread. In fact, it might seem arrogant for lawyers to begin all meetings with their financials.


HAHA About a Lawyer Not Having to Divulge Information

LL, it may be true that a lawyer doesn't have to do this or that, but if I'm paying him to advise me and if he wants me to keep paying him for doing other work, he better be telling me the details of his involvement in anything questionable.

Little Lamb

Time for new blood

It might be time to sever the county's ties with Batchelor and hire a new law firm. Governments really should rotate those duties around instead of staying with the same attorney for years and years.