• Comment

Opinion: The ball is in Allen's court... room

Posted: January 29, 2014 - 12:12am

It’s not a smoking gun.

But it also isn’t the kind of evidence that helps Tax Commissioner Kay Allen’s claim that she wasn’t aware of a change in state law that could have an effect on lucrative contracts she had with Grovetown and Harlem for the collection of city property taxes.

The state Department of Revenue supplied some documents this week that indicate Allen attended training in Athens in May 2007 that included information on the change to the law.

The documents show that the issue of tax commissioner’s compensation was specifically addressed and that Allen received credit for attending the class. However, the documents don’t rule out the possibility that Allen might have stepped out to the ladies room and missed something important.

Allen’s high-powered lawyer, Doug Chalmers Jr. makes some good points in her defense, which one would expect.

He says the statute isn’t as clear-cut as everyone seems to think it is. Chalmers says that when the law changed in 2007, it didn’t yet apply to Columbia County, which was still below the law’s 50,000-parcel threshold.

Chalmers also says that Allen, like all state and county officials, received training each year on dozens of subjects and changes to various policies and laws. How are they supposed to remember them all?

Of course, these are good points and they ultimately might be what keeps prosecutors on the sidelines while Chalmers and attorney’s hired by Columbia County come to an agreeable resolution.

But it sort of boils down to one thing: What did Kay Allen know?

It is true that in 2007, the law did not apply to Columbia County. But if she did receive training on the law and its impact, it is hard to believe that Allen would not have noted how this change might affect her future earnings (considering that booming Columbia County was adding hundreds of parcels each year).

Is it possible that the impact of the law didn’t register and it flew under the radar until someone pointed it out last year? Sure.

Is it also possible that Allen was aware of the law but was too attached to the more than $30,000 per year in extra pay from Grovetown and Harlem that she stood to lose? Perhaps.

Only one person knows for sure, and she isn’t talking.

  • Comment

Comments (2)


Allen Recently Said Money Is Hers

She certainly knew the law, but if she wants to claim ignorance, who cares? It’s the law. Reportedly, she even spoke up once at a meeting concerning the law change and said she would keep the money. Recently, when this story broke, she again ferociously said in response, although she surely knew the law then, that the money was hers and she would keep it. Resign, pay the money back and plead for leniency with the DA and judge.

Sweet son

Riverman is usually right with his comments but this time he has

hit the nail on the head! This woman knew the law and she knew how many parcels were on the Columbia County tax roles. She stole the money and she got caught.

Even worse she made a 15 year employee do menial tasks after he most probably reminded her that what she was doing was against the law. This employee probably brought the problem to the attention of law enforcement after he was fired for basically no reason.

Ms. Allen will probably get off on a technicality but she should resign but we all bet that won't happen.